Feeling lost?
Why not try these options:
  • Search
  • Browse
or
Call us on

Televisions - US - January 2011

Televisions - US - January 2011

Despite the recession, the television market has enjoyed steady growth in unit volume as flat panels reached mainstream adoption over the last five years. However, stalling momentum in 2010 suggests that macroeconomic forces are finally catching up to the industry. Manufacturers are under pressure to generate new sources of premium (eg 3DTV) and will need to gauge consumer appetites carefully to invest in the right technologies.

In this exclusive report, Mintel takes a look at the innovations and consumer attitudes that shape the intensely competitive dynamics of the TV industry....

£2,534.48

Despite the recession, the television market has enjoyed steady growth in unit volume as flat panels reached mainstream adoption over the last five years. However, stalling momentum in 2010 suggests that macroeconomic forces are finally catching up to the industry. Manufacturers are under pressure to generate new sources of premium (eg 3DTV) and will need to gauge consumer appetites carefully to invest in the right technologies.

In this exclusive report, Mintel takes a look at the innovations and consumer attitudes that shape the intensely competitive dynamics of the TV industry.

Analysis and insights offered include:

  • Where LCD and plasma technology is headed
  • Why 3DTV isn’t working and what might fix it
  • Which demographics specific brands are targeting
  • How distribution channels can be used strategically
  • How many consumers are still in the market
  • What motivations drive current purchases
  • How much a brand name is worth
  • Which value-added features consumers will pay extra for

Scope and Themes


What you need to know


Definition


Data sources


Sales data

Consumer survey data

Advertising

Abbreviations and terms


Abbreviations

Terms

Executive Summary


LCD flat panels dominate TV market


Time spent on TV faces challenges from internet and box office


Dramatic price decreases drive mainstream adoption of flat panels


Manufacturers look to 3D and TV apps for premium


Rise of disruptive technology shuffles brand dominance


CE chains and mass merchandisers are key strategic channels


Leading brands further segment the under-45 demographic


Innovations focus on improving 3DTV and TV apps


Household income is greatest determinant of flat-panel ownership


Decision-makers see less differentiation among brands


Picture quality more of an issue for under-35s and the family demographic


Significant minority will buy an unfamiliar brand to save money


Interest in paying for extra TV functionality is low


Insights and Opportunities


Upgrades around the house are a large component of demand


Green positioning makes premium price points easier to swallow


Dads are more receptive to TV product marketing


Inspire Insights


Trend—That’s (Home) Entertainment!


Market Size and Forecast


Future growth rests on adoption of higher-margin technologies


Sales and forecast


Figure 1: U.S. factory sales and forecast of televisions, at current prices, 2006-12

Figure 2: U.S. factory sales and forecast of televisions, at inflation-adjusted prices, 2006-12

Market Drivers


Price promotions trump slump in consumer confidence


Figure 3: Changes in unit price and unit volume of LCD and plasma flat-panel TVs, 2007-10

Cautious consumers looking for low-cost upgrades


Figure 4: Characteristics of televisions owned, 2006-10

3D technology fails to inspire new purchases


Lack of content

Internet-based TV apps expand functionality


End of analog transmission makes older tube TVs obsolete


Competitive Context


Internet-delivered content draws viewers away from TV


Internet on the TV

Movie theaters increase bang for the buck


Segment Performance


LCD increases dominance over older technologies


Sales by segment


Figure 5: U.S. factory sales of televisions, by type, 2008 and 2010

Figure 6: U.S. factory sales of televisions, by type, 2006-12

Segment Performance—LCD Flat Panel


Newer LED models help stem declining average unit prices


LCD flat-panel sales and forecast


Figure 7: U.S. factory sales and forecast of LCD flat-panel TVs, at current prices, 2006-12

Figure 8: U.S. factory unit sales of LCD flat-panel TVs, at current prices, 2006-10

Segment Performance—Plasma Flat Panel


Plasma continues slide but sees boost from value segment


Plasma flat-panel sales and forecast


Figure 9: U.S. factory sales and forecast of plasma flat-panel TVs, at current prices, 2006-12

Figure 10: U.S. factory unit sales of plasma flat-panel TVs, at current prices, 2006-10

Segment Performance—Front Projection


Price drops most dramatic for front projectors


Front projection sales and forecast


Figure 11: U.S. factory sales and forecast of front projection TVs, at current prices, 2006-12

Figure 12: U.S. factory unit sales of front projection TVs, at current prices, 2006-10

Segment Performance—Digital Rear Projection


Rear projection maintains price points with niche appeal


Digital rear projection sales and forecast


Figure 13: U.S. factory sales and forecast of digital rear projection TVs, at current prices, 2006-12

Figure 14: U.S. factory unit sales of digital rear projection TVs, at current prices, 2006-10

Leading Brands


Korean brands ascend while former leaders lose share


Figure 15: Ownership of leading television brands, 2006-10

Sony carries most brand equity but outsold by Samsung and LG


Vizio represents power and danger of competing on price


Figure 16: Desirability of leading television brands, October 2010

Innovation and Innovators


3DTV continues to evolve


3D without glasses

Passive 3D glasses

Twin View touch remote control acts as mobile device


CES 2011—New TV models offer thinner bodies and even greater internet convergence


Samsung

Vizio

Sony

LG

Panasonic

Marketing Strategies


Overview


Figure 17: Adspend of leading television brands, 2008 and 2009

Television advertising


Samsung


Figure 18: Samsung 3D LED TV—Aquatic living room, television ad, March 2010

Figure 19: Samsung 3D LED TV—Soccer fanatics, television ad, June 2010

Figure 20: Samsung apps platform—New York couple, television ad, October 2010

LG


Figure 21: LG Infinia Series—The End, television ad, May 2010

Vizio


Figure 22: Vizio televisions—Beyoncé competes, television ad, November 2010

Sharp


Figure 23: Sharp Aquos—Quattron technology, television ad, March 2010

Toshiba


Figure 24: Toshiba Cinema Series—Woman in car, television ad, October 2010

Online advertising


Standout websites incorporate visual sophistication and social media


Point of sale advertising


National events and tours give consumers a chance to experience 3D


Retail Distribution


Chain electronics stores and mass merchandisers instrumental in channel strategies


Chain electronics stores

Figure 25: Where home theater hardware is purchased, by household income, October 2010

Best Buy helps Sony implement uniform consumer messaging


Ownership and Intent to Buy


Household income determines likelihood of flat panel ownership


Figure 26: Penetration of TV technologies and large screen size, by key demographics, October 2009-June 2010

Respondents may favor secondary flat-panel upgrades over newest tech


Figure 27: Ownership of and intent to buy types of TVs, October 2010

Two thirds of respondents have purchased a TV in the last four years


Figure 28: Timing of last TV purchase, by household income, October 2010

Decision Factors


Decision-makers more likely to weigh technicalities and see less differentiation


Figure 29: Considerations in the purchase decision, October 2010

Highest earners more likely to compare technicals


Figure 30: Considerations in the purchase decision, by household income, October 2010

Attitudes toward Televisions


Positioning as upgrades may benefit small to medium screen sizes


Figure 31: Attitudes toward televisions, October 2010

Boomers want upgrades as much as under-35s


Figure 32: Attitudes toward televisions, by age, October 2010

Family demographic less satisfied with picture quality


Figure 33: Attitudes toward televisions, by presence of children, October 2010

Attitudes toward Price Points


Consumers willing to save on brand but spend on green


Figure 34: Attitudes toward price points, October 2010

Willingness to try unfamiliar brands not limited to lower earners


Figure 35: Attitudes toward price points, by household income, October 2010

Family demographic more likely to buy more expensive models


Figure 36: Attitudes toward price points, by presence of children, October 2010

Other Uses of the Television


New functionalities for TV unlikely to justify premium


Figure 37: Interest in new functionalities of internet-enabled TVs, October 2010

Digital Streaming Services


Strong interest in Netflix reflects consumer attraction to value plays


Figure 38: Usage of and interest in streaming content sources, October 2010

Under-35s show early interest but Netflix spreading to older users


Figure 39: Usage of and interest in streaming content sources, by age, October 2010

Respondents currently in the marketplace are more likely drawn to Netflix and Amazon on Demand


Figure 40: Interest in streaming content sources, by intent to purchase, October 2010

Impact of Race and Hispanic Origin


Key points


Asian respondents more likely to be early adopters


Attitudes toward price points

Figure 41: Attitudes toward price points, by race and Hispanic origin, October 2010

Desirability of leading brands

Figure 42: Desirability of leading television brands, by race and Hispanic origin, October 2010

Attitudes toward televisions

Figure 43: Attitudes toward televisions, by race and Hispanic origin, October 2010

Streaming content sources

Figure 44: Usage of and interest in streaming content sources, by race and Hispanic origin, October 2010

Cluster Analysis


Searchers


Demographics

Characteristics

Opportunity

Technicals


Demographics

Characteristics

Opportunity

Off-brands


Demographics

Characteristics

Opportunity

Cluster characteristics


Figure 45: Television clusters, October 2010

Figure 46: Attitudes toward price points, by television clusters, October 2010

Figure 47: Considerations in the purchase decision, by television clusters, October 2010

Figure 48: Attitudes toward televisions, by television clusters, October 2010

Cluster demographics


Figure 49: Television clusters, by gender, October 2010

Figure 50: Television clusters, by age, October 2010

Figure 51: Television clusters, by household income, October 2010

Figure 52: Television clusters, by race and Hispanic origin, October 2010

Cluster methodology


Custom Consumer Groups


Within family households, dads make a better target than moms


Intent to buy

Figure 53: Intent to buy types of TVs, by gender and presence of children, October 2010

Decision factors

Figure 54: Considerations in the purchase decision, by gender and presence of children, October 2010

Other uses of the TV

Figure 55: Interest in new functionalities of internet-enabled TVs, by gender and presence of children, October 2010

Streaming content services

Figure 56: Usage of and interest in streaming content sources, by gender and presence of children, October 2010

Desirability of leading brands

Figure 57: Desirability of leading television brands, by gender and presence of children, October 2010

Appendix—Other Useful Consumer Tables


Decision factors


Figure 58: Considerations in the purchase decision, by gender, October 2010

Figure 59: Considerations in the purchase decision, by age, October 2010

Attitudes toward price points


Figure 60: Attitudes toward price points, by age, October 2010

Desirability of leading brands


Figure 61: Desirability of leading television brands, by household income, October 2010

Appendix—Trade Associations


  • Advanced Television Systems Committee
  • Blockbuster USA
  • Consumer Electronics Association
  • Cyber Security Industry Alliance
  • Google, Inc.
  • Hitachi (USA)
  • Incos Ltd
  • LG Electronics Inc (USA)
  • Logitech Inc.
  • Macy's, Inc.
  • Microsoft USA
  • National Association of Theater Owners (NATO)
  • National Basketball Association
  • Nebraska Furniture Mart, Inc.
  • Netflix, Inc.
  • Panasonic Corporation of North America
  • Samsung Electronics (USA)
  • Sanyo North America Corporation
  • Sony Corporation of America
  • THOMSON (RCA)
  • Toshiba Corporation (USA)
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
  • Walmart Stores (USA)
  • Yahoo! Inc
Registered office :

Mintel Group Ltd.
11 Pilgrim Street, London, EC4V 6RN
Registered in England: Number 1475918.

Geolocation by www.maxmind.com