Feeling lost?
Why not try these options:
  • Search
  • Browse
or
Call us on

Web Aggregators in Financial Services - UK - July 2011

Web Aggregators in Financial Services - UK - July 2011

This report discusses how, as the price comparison and aggregator market is rapidly approaching maturity, an established group of market leaders has emerged, the proportion of consumers prepared to use the sites has steadily grown how people are now showing signs of a fairly sophisticated understanding of how the sites work and how best to use them. Although still dominated by general insurance, consumers are showing a growing willingness to turn to the comparison sites to research the likes of credit cards and savings accounts.

Aggregators do, though, face a number of challenges. The sites struggle to achieve differentiation, meaning that they are locked into a constant and expensive, advertising-led battle to maintain market share. Mintel’s research shows that each of the leading sites has carved out a distinctive brand identity, but the difference is relatively superficial, and loyalty remains low.

Some factors discussed in the report include:

  • What opportunities exist for attracting new customers in the price comparison market?
  • What are the latest consumer trends in comparison site usage?
  • How can non-users and consumers opposed to using price comparison sites be converted?
£2,195.00

In this report, Mintel examines the way in which consumers research financial products, and the role that comparison sites play in this research process. The number and type of financial products that they buy through aggregators is assessed, and Mintel highlights what they look for in these sites. Extensive research into how consumers perceive the leading brands in the market identifies the individual sites’ strengths and weaknesses. Consumers’ attitudes towards the sector as a whole are examined, highlighting ways in which sites can help build the differentiation that is currently lacking.

Introduction


Abbreviations


Executive Summary


The market


Price-comparison sites now the primary source of financial information

Figure 1: Sources of information used to research financial products, April 2011

A fifth have researched at least seven products through aggregators…

Figure 2: Repertoire of aggregator usage for research, April 2011

…and most internet users have bought at least one product through the sites

Figure 3: Repertoire of aggregator usage for purchase, April 2011

Companies, brands and innovation


Four sites dominate the market

Figure 4: Unique visitor numbers to key aggregator sites, year to April 2011

Little differentiation, but moneysupermarket.com leads on trust

Figure 5: Attitudes towards and usage of price-comparison website brands, February 2011

Key factors when using comparison sites


Price still dominates – but not at the expense of cover

Figure 6: Key factors when using aggregator sites to arrange insurance, April 2011

The consumer


Most internet users think aggregators offer a valuable service

Figure 7: Attitudes towards aggregator sites, April 2011

What we think


Issues in the Market


Can product providers head off the aggregator challenge?


What needs to be done to draw new customers into the market?


Can aggregators build differentiation by appealing to niche markets?


Who are the most committed users of comparison sites?


What can be done to bring around the sceptics?


Future Opportunities


The difference engine


Teaching people how to survive


Online Trends


Key points


Comparison sites are now mainstream


Figure 8: Types of website visited, April 2011

Broadband now reaches seven in ten adults…


Figure 9: Broadband penetration, 2004-10

…and is used by a broad cross-section of society


Figure 10: Broadband penetration, by age and socio-economic group, 2010

The internet becomes the research tool of choice


Figure 11: Agreement with selected lifestyle statements on buying products online, 2005-10

Primary Sources of Financial Information


Key points


Three in five use aggregators as a primary source of financial information


Figure 12: Sources of information used to research financial products, April 2011

Aggregator sites span class and generational barriers


Sites Used to Research Financial Services


Key points


Four aggregators dominate financial information sites


Figure 13: Choice of financial information sites, April 2011

Little loyalty among the aggregator enthusiasts


Figure 14: Choice of financial information sites, by number of products researched through aggregators, April 2011

Figure 15: Choice of financial information sites, by number of products bought through aggregators, April 2011

Aggregator Site Usage


Key points


Moneysupermarket.com leads the way


Figure 16: Unique visitor numbers to key aggregator sites, year to April 2011

Company Profiles


Comparethemarket.com


Figure 17: Financial performance of BISL Ltd, 2009 and 2010

Confused.com


Figure 18: Financial performance of confused.com, 2009 and 2010

Gocompare.com


Figure 19: Financial performance of gocompare.com, 2009 and 2010

Moneysupermarket.com


Figure 20: Financial performance of moneysupermarket.com, 2009 and 2010

Uswitch.com


Figure 21: Financial performance of uSwitch Ltd, 2008 and 2009

Beatthatquote.com


Figure 22: Financial performance of beatthatquote.com Ltd, 2009 and 2010

Brand Research


Brand map


Figure 23: Attitudes towards and usage of price-comparison website brands, February 2011

Brand attitudes


Figure 24: Attitudes, by price-comparison website brand, February 2011

Brand personality


Figure 25: Price-comparison website brand personality – macro image, February 2011

Figure 26: Price-comparison website brand personality – micro image, February 2011

Correspondence analysis

Brand experience


Figure 27: Price-comparison website brand usage, February 2011

Figure 28: Satisfaction with various price-comparison website brands, February 2011

Figure 29: Consideration of price-comparison website brands, February 2011

Figure 30: Consumer perceptions of current price-comparison website brand performance, February 2011

Figure 31: Price-comparison website brand recommendation – Net Promoter Score, February 2011

Brand index


Figure 32: Price-comparison website brand index, February 2011

Figure 33: Price-comparison website brand index vs. recommendation, February 2011

Target group analysis


Figure 34: Target groups, February 2011

Figure 35: Price-comparison website brand usage, by target groups, February 2011

Group One – The Conformists

Group Two – Simply the Best

Group Three – Shelf Stalkers

Group Four – Habitual Shoppers

Group Five – The Individualists

Brand Communication and Promotion


Key points


Adspend tops £90 million


Figure 36: Overview of advertising expenditure in aggregators market, 2008/09-2010/11*

Little scope to step back from the advertising war


The link between adspend and visitor numbers...


Figure 37: Adspend and visitor number trends across the key aggregator sites, April 2010-March 2011

...and the advantage of being the market leader


Figure 38: Monthly advertising expenditure and visitor numbers, by selected aggregators, 2010/11

Gocompare.com tops adspend


Figure 39: Advertising expenditure, by selected aggregators, 2008/09-2010/11*

TV is the channel of choice


Figure 40: Advertising expenditure, by media type, 2008/09-2010/11*

Products Researched and Arranged Through Aggregators


Key points


Three quarters have used comparison sites to research products


Figure 41: Aggregator usage, April 2011

Polarisation in usage patterns…


Figure 42: Repertoire of aggregator usage for research, April 2011

…and in buying behaviour


Figure 43: Repertoire of aggregator usage for purchase, April 2011

The journey from researching car insurance to buying investment products


Figure 44: Aggregator usage, by repertoire of aggregator usage for research, April 2011

Figure 45: Aggregator usage, by repertoire of aggregator usage for purchase, April 2011

Heavy users are more web-savvy – but not much more


Figure 46: Types of website visited, by number of products researched through aggregators, April 2011

Price-comparison sites aren’t yet supplanting traditional channels…


…and for intensive users, it’s ‘as well as’, not ‘instead of’


Figure 47: Primary sources of financial information, by aggregator usage, April 2011

Use extends across all age groups...


...but it’s the more affluent who are making the most of the money-saving opportunities


Attitudes towards Aggregators


Key points


A market full of positives – but still some reservations


Figure 48: Attitudes towards aggregator sites, April 2011

Researchers recognise the shortcomings


Figure 49: Agreement with attitudes towards aggregator sites, by number of products researched through aggregators, April 2011

A chance for product providers to head off the aggregator challenge?


Transparency and education


Figure 50: Attitudes towards aggregator sites, by the number of products purchased through aggregators, April 2011

What People Look for in an Aggregator Site


Key points


It’s really not all about price…


Figure 51: Key factors when using aggregator sites to arrange insurance, April 2011

…but transparency is an issue for the regulators, not consumers


Is accuracy taken for granted? And is a lack of transparency ‘just one of those things’?


Little difference between experienced users and non-users…


…and responses confirm that inaccurate quotations are not a major consumer concern


Figure 52: Key factors when using aggregator sites to arrange insurance, by type of products researched or purchased through aggregators, April 2011

Figure 53: Key factors when using aggregator sites to arrange insurance, by products purchased through aggregators, April 2011

Could reviews help the information gatherers?


Figure 54: Key factors when using aggregator sites, by the number of products researched through aggregators, April 2011

Making life easier for the power users


Figure 55: Key factors when using aggregator sites, by the number of products purchased through aggregators, April 2011

The changing importance of price


Figure 56: Importance of price, cover and accuracy when using aggregators to compare insurance products, by age, April 2011

Aggregator Associations


Key points


Strongly positive associations…


Figure 57: Aggregator word association, 2010 and 2011

…but shortfalls are evident


Positive associations grow with experience


Figure 58: Aggregator word association, by number of products researched through an aggregator, April 2011

Time to address the perception of restricted choice and inconsistency


Inconsistency is an issue for the fans as well as the detractors


Figure 59: Aggregator word association, by number of products purchased through an aggregator, April 2011

User Segmentation


Key points


From appreciative to sceptical


Figure 60: Aggregator target groups, April 2011

The Advocates


The Sceptics


The Middle Ground


The Unengaged


Figure 61: Aggregator word association, by target groups, April 2011

Information-hungry Advocates


Figure 62: Primary sources of information used to research financial products, by target groups, April 2011

Scepticism is no barrier to using comparison sites...


Figure 63: Products researched through an aggregator site, by target groups, April 2011

...while even some Advocates are wary of actually buying


Figure 64: Products purchased through an aggregator site, by target groups, April 2011

A recognition of the sites’ shortfalls...


Figure 65: Attitudes towards aggregator sites, by target groups, April 2011

...from the fans as well as from the cynics


Bringing in the Unengaged


Figure 66: Key factors when using aggregator sites to buy insurance, by target groups, April 2011

More signs that Sceptics are looking for guidance


Appendix – Primary Sources of Financial Information


Figure 67: Most popular sources of information used to research financial products, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 68: Next most popular sources of information used to research financial products, by demographics, April 2011

Appendix – Sites Used to Research Financial Services


Figure 69: Most popular choice of aggregator sites ‘have used, but not within the last year’, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 70: Next most popular choice of aggregator sites ‘have used, but not within the last year’, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 71: Most popular choice of aggregator sites ‘have used within the last year’, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 72: Next most popular choice of aggregator sites ‘have used within the last year’, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 73: Other choice of aggregator sites ‘have used within the last year’, by demographics, April 2011

Appendix – Brand Research


Figure 74: Brand usage, February 2011

Figure 75: Brand commitment, February 2011

Figure 76: Brand momentum, February 2011

Figure 77: Brand diversity, February 2011

Figure 78: Brand satisfaction, February 2011

Figure 79: Brand recommendation, February 2011

Figure 80: Brand attitude, February 2011

Figure 81: Brand image – Macro image, February 2011

Figure 82: Brand image – Micro image, February 2011

Figure 83: Profile of target groups, by demographics, February 2011

Figure 84: Psychographic segmentation, by target groups, February 2011

Figure 85: Brand usage, by target groups, February 2011

Figure 86: Brand index, February 2011

Appendix – Products Researched and Arranged Through Aggregators


Figure 87: Most popular ‘researched’ aggregator usage, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 88: Next most popular ‘researched’ aggregator usage, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 89: Other ‘researched’ aggregator usage, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 90: Most popular ‘purchased’ aggregator usage, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 91: Next most popular ‘purchased’ aggregator usage, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 92: Other ‘purchased’ aggregator usage, by demographics, April 2011

Appendix – Attitudes Towards Aggregator Sites


Figure 93: Most popular attitudes towards aggregator sites, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 94: Next most popular attitudes towards aggregator sites, by demographics, April 2011

Appendix – What People Look for in an Aggregator Site


Figure 95: Most popular key factors when using aggregator sites, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 96: Next most popular key factors when using aggregator sites, by demographics, April 2011

Appendix – Aggregator Associations


Figure 97: Most popular aggregator word association, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 98: Next most popular aggregator word association, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 99: Other aggregator word association, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 100: Least popular aggregator word association, by demographics, April 2011

Appendix – User Segmentation


Figure 101: Target groups, by demographics, April 2011

Figure 102: Choice of aggregator sites, by target groups, April 2011

Figure 103: Attitudes towards aggregator sites, by target groups, April 2011

  • Admiral Insurance
  • Aldi Stores Ltd (UK)
  • Allianz Group
  • Argos
  • Asda Group Ltd
  • Automobile Association (AA)
  • BeatThatQuote.com
  • BGL Group
  • British Sky Broadcasting Group plc (BSkyB)
  • Channel 4
  • Co-operative Group
  • ComparetheMarket.com
  • Daily Mail
  • Direct Line Group Limited
  • Facebook, Inc.
  • Financial Services Authority (The)
  • Forward Internet Group
  • Freeview
  • GoCompare
  • Google UK
  • Halifax Mortgage Services
  • J Sainsbury
  • Kantar Media
  • Kelkoo S.A.
  • Lidl (UK)
  • Marks & Spencer
  • mmO2 plc
  • MoneyExpert Ltd
  • Moneyextra
  • Moneysavingexpert
  • MoneySupermarket.com Limited
  • MORE TH>N
  • MSN UK
  • Norwich Union
  • Orange plc (UK)
  • Post Office Limited
  • Swiftcover
  • T-Mobile (UK) Ltd
  • TalkTalk Telecom Ltd.
  • Tesco Plc
  • Twitter, Inc.
  • Virgin Group Ltd.
  • Virgin Mobile
  • Virgin Money
  • Vodafone Group Plc (UK)
  • Waitrose Ltd
  • Wm Morrison Supermarkets
  • Yahoo! UK & Ireland
Registered office :

Mintel Group Ltd.
11 Pilgrim Street, London, EC4V 6RN
Registered in England: Number 1475918.

Geolocation by www.maxmind.com