US Consumer Approach to Lunch Report 2025
Consumers remain largely ambivalent about lunch, with only 45% associating “satisfaction” with their midday meal.
Consumers remain largely ambivalent about lunch, with only 45% associating “satisfaction” with their midday meal.
Consumers remain largely ambivalent about lunch, with only 45% associating “satisfaction” with their midday meal. The paradox, however, is that fewer than a third want lunch to be a more enjoyable experience. A filling lunch is by far the most agreed upon quality, though emphasis varies somewhat for those that WFH versus in an office.
For brands to successfully introduce new products or concepts, they must demonstrate minimal disruption while emphasizing clear benefits. While consumers may not desire drastic changes to lunch, they do value convenience and compatibility with their daily routines.
The most significant demographic differences exist between Baby Boomers and other generations; while some of this may be life stage, Millennials and Gen Z seem to have a fundamental difference in their approach to lunch. These consumers are more likely than their older counterparts to seek variety and eat lunch with others.
Overall, a focus on the non-food aspects of lunch can help remind consumers that, even if they don’t need or want a complex meal, they should take a break to boost their energy. Brands can ensure a lunch break is restorative, not disruptive, by offering nutritious, tasty, and low-effort lunch items that are quick, easy and convenient to plan for, prepare and ultimately eat.
Ease and balance are the key to lunchtime success. Food choices need to fit into consumer days seamlessly; otherwise, lunch breaks are more stressful than energizing.
Michele Scott, Associate Director, US Research – Food and Drink